Gems – Christopher Thelen

Gems
Columbia Records, 1988
Reviewed by Christopher Thelen
Published on Mar 24, 2004

Ah, nothing spells a band’s comeback success like their old
label’s re-issuing of their material, does it? Just a year after
Aerosmith cemented the fact they were back to stay with
Permanent Vacation, their then-former label decided to claim
another stake of the pie with their release of
Gems.

In a sense, you could think of this as the sequel to
Aerosmith’s Greatest Hits, but in truth, this disc is much
better than its predecessor. Yeah, all of the big hits were on the
first best-of collection, but they were remixed and manipulated
into tracks which barely resembled their original brethren. At
least
Gems leaves the originals alone, and throws in a previously
unreleased track to boot.

This set does many things right. First, it doesn’t deny the
existence of sub-par Aerosmith albums. It took some guts to include
“No Surprize” (off
Night In The Ruts) and “Jailbait” (off the abysmal
Rock In A Hard Place), but they turn out to be gambles which
pay off. Far removed from the full albums, these tracks do sound a
bit better than one would normally give them credit for.

Second, the inclusion of “Chip Away The Stone” is a welcome
addition to Aerosmith’s catalog. Granted, a live version was on
Live Bootleg back in 1978, but the studio version absolutely
smokes with power and intensity. Why this one remained hidden for
so long is anyone’s guess, but it’s a great track.

Third, attention is turned back to some Aerosmith tracks which
are just as worthy of people’s attention as the over-played radio
hits. I’ve been listening to some of these albums now for about two
decades, and it’s still exciting to hear songs like “Rats In The
Cellar,” “Lick And A Promise” and “Lord Of The Thighs.”

Ironically, though, it’s the lack of any of the familiar hits
which turns out to be a minor weakness on
Gems. Yeah, I recognize that repackaging some or all of them
might be seen as a desperate attempt to cash in, but maybe the
producers could have included the original versions of “Sweet
Emotion” or “Same Old Song And Dance” instead of the edited
versions on
Aerosmith’s Greatest Hits. In reality,
Gems is caught in a catch-22 caused by no direct fault of
the album.

Somehow, this particular release has been forgotten over the
passage of time — that and the inundation of best-ofs from
Aerosmith over the last few years. But
Gems is a disc which lives up to its name and is well worth
the investment, especially for anyone who wants to discover more of
Aerosmith than what they can hear played on rock radio.

Rating: B+

Leave a Reply